| ▲ | FridayoLeary 7 hours ago |
| It's expected never to encounter any other object in all eternity. Unless of course someone deliberately aims for it. I heard once it will eventually lose it's form entirely and just drift through space as a melted lump of metal. For some reason that reminds me of Red Dwarf. We are going to lose it before long i wonder if it will be possible to find it on a future date in theory. |
|
| ▲ | Retric 6 hours ago | parent | next [-] |
| I doubt that’s true. At minimum it’s going to hit an enormous quantity of micrometer sized objects. It’s gravitationally bound to the Milky way so it’s going to keep wandering into and out of star systems for a very long time. We’re talking a large multiple of the age of the universe meanwhile plenty of space rocks show encounters with other space rocks on a vastly smaller timescale. If nothing else it’s got decent odds of being part of the star formation process. Stars are ~10% of the milky way’s mass and star formation is going to continue for a while. |
| |
| ▲ | saulpw 5 hours ago | parent | next [-] | | Supposing that it does become part of a new star, and some "nearby" civilization had sufficiently precise instruments...would that be a detectable anomaly? Like some atoms of Plutonium still haven't decayed, and isn't that weird that Plutonium's spectral signature is present in this new star? Or is that just something that happens because some plutonium is created in a supernova and might just have been floating around anyway. | |
| ▲ | gerdesj 6 hours ago | parent | prev | next [-] | | Quite. It will hit the occasional something, eventually. If nothing else it will be mildly bathed in radiation of some sort. | |
| ▲ | pfdietz 5 hours ago | parent | prev [-] | | It's going to hit gas that will slowly but inexorably sputter it to nothing. |
|
|
| ▲ | bad_haircut72 6 hours ago | parent | prev | next [-] |
| Its gonna prove the closed manifold hypothesis when it shows up coming from the opposite direction in a few hundred million years |
|
| ▲ | nomel 7 hours ago | parent | prev | next [-] |
| > I heard once it will eventually lose it's form entirely It will be sitting at something like -450F. Could it really lose form!? Is the idea that all the phonons could converge to one point, shifting an atom of metal (which will happen infinitely with infinite time)? Maybe with random photons/hydrogen/whatever "continuously" adding energy? Neat. |
| |
| ▲ | Scubabear68 6 hours ago | parent | next [-] | | From what I recall, one of the hazards of long term space travel is that nearly any material will start sublimating atoms in the hard vacuum of space, with things like cosmic rays adding to the woes. Some over time it will start deteriorating. Not sure about “melting” into an amorphous mass, I guess in theory the probes gravity could do that, but I would imagine even the tiniest force would disturb that and dissipate it. | |
| ▲ | antonvs 6 hours ago | parent | prev [-] | | One issue is that over long enough timeframes, even atoms that we consider stable will decay - particularly ones that are heavier than iron, which will decay towards iron or nickel. That decay will eventually compromise the structure of the probes. |
|
|
| ▲ | Aboutplants 6 hours ago | parent | prev | next [-] |
| Ah, so this is how asteroids are made! |
|
| ▲ | didacusc 7 hours ago | parent | prev | next [-] |
| No chance of it ever being hit by anything? |
| |
| ▲ | nomel 7 hours ago | parent | next [-] | | > It's expected never to encounter any other object in all eternity. This is read as "near zero" rather than "no chance". "Expected" is a word of uncertainty. I think the rough napkin math would be: take the volume that the probe will sweep through and multiply it by the volume of matter in the universe/volume of the universe. | |
| ▲ | nemo44x 3 hours ago | parent | prev [-] | | Space is well named. |
|
|
| ▲ | babylon5 7 hours ago | parent | prev [-] |
| It's cold out there, why would it melt? |
| |