Alacritty is seemingly affected by this, which sucks for people who install it from homebrew because there's no way the developers are going to shell out to Apple for the signature.

https://github.com/alacritty/alacritty/issues/8749

Does anyone know if self-signed binaries will work?

▲

valicord 6 hours ago | parent [-]

if it's an open source project, why is it using a cask anyway? it should be a formula that builds from source directly

	▲	nixpulvis 5 hours ago \| parent [-]
		I don't know much about macOS these days, but I was under the impression that Casks were for applications, and normal formula were for things installed in your PATH as standalone binaries. The .app needs a few extra things bundled up. EDIT: I looked it up, the issue is that homebrew explicitly doesn't want .app formulas: https://docs.brew.sh/Acceptable-Formulae#stuff-that-builds-a... IDK what they expect. Every open source application developer needs to pay $99/yr now? I mean you can always get the DMG from the releases on GitHub, so I guess we can just point people there and abandon homebrew. https://github.com/alacritty/alacritty/releases