There's an awesome shader on shadertoy that illustrates just how extreme the fovea focus is: https://www.shadertoy.com/view/4dsXzM

Linus the shrill/yappy poodle and his channel are less than worthless IMO.

▲

jasonjmcghee 12 hours ago | parent | next [-]

When you full screen this, it's crazy how tiny the area that spins is. For me it's like an inch or inch and a half on a 32 inch 4k display at a normal seated position.

(If I move my head closer it gets larger, further and it gets smaller)

▲

Night_Thastus 12 hours ago | parent | prev | next [-]

Imagine if we could hook this into game rendering as well. Have super high resolution models, textures, shadows, etc near where the player is looking, and use lower LoDs elsewhere.

It could really push the boundaries of detail and efficiency, if we could somehow do it real-time for something that complex. (Streaming video sounds a lot easier)

	▲	ziml77 10 hours ago \| parent \| next [-]
		Foveated rendering is already a thing. But since it needs to be coded for in the game, it's not really being used on PC games. Games designed for Playstation with the PS VR 2 in mind do use foveated rendering since they know their games are being played with hardware that provides eye tracking.
	▲	scld 11 hours ago \| parent \| prev \| next [-]
		Game rendering is what they're talking about here. John Carmack has talked about this a bunch if you'd like to seed a google search.
	▲	pixelpoet 8 hours ago \| parent \| prev [-]
		As a lover of ray/path tracing I'm obligated to point out: rasterisation gets its efficiency by amortising the cost of per-triangle setup over many pixels. This more or less forces you to do fixed-resolution rendering; it's very efficient at this, which is why even today with hardware RT, rasterisation remains the fastest and most power-efficient way to do visibility processing (under certain conditions). However, this efficiency starts to drop off as soon as you want to do things like stencil reflections, and especially shadow maps, to say nothing of global illumination. While there are some recent'ish extensions to do variable-rate shading in rasterisation[0], this isn't variable-rate visibility determination (well, you can do stochastic rasterisation[1], but it's not implemented in hardware), and with ray tracing you can do as fine-grained distribution of rays as you like. TL;DR for foveated rendering, ray tracing is the efficiency king, not rasterisation. But don't worry, ray tracing will eventually replace all rasterisation anyway :) [0] https://developer.nvidia.com/vrworks/graphics/variableratesh... [1] https://research.nvidia.com/sites/default/files/pubs/2010-06...

▲

ehnto 4 hours ago | parent | prev [-]

That's quite harsh, and definitely not accurate.