| ▲ | stetrain 12 hours ago | |||||||
This isn’t likely to be a compelling spatial computer. The pass-through video is monochrome and the screens have about 40% of the pixels compared to the Vision Pro. The Samsung Galaxy XR is much closer to being a Vision Pro competitor. The Steam Frame is very focused on playing games locally and streamed from a PC. | ||||||||
| ▲ | Philpax 12 hours ago | parent | next [-] | |||||||
I'd be willing to take the L on the hardware in order to be able to actually run the software I care about. (I own a Vision Pro and barely use it because the pejorative description of "an iPad on your face" is more accurate than I would like to admit.) | ||||||||
| ||||||||
| ▲ | skeaker 7 hours ago | parent | prev | next [-] | |||||||
Monochrome is rough, but I think pixel count is a few orders of magnitude less important than being able to actually use the damn thing. The Vision Pro has been out for over a year and I haven't seen a single notable application that takes advantage of the hardware, and it seems that that's largely in part due to it being nigh impossible to develop and run software on it. | ||||||||
| ▲ | wayeq 5 hours ago | parent | prev [-] | |||||||
> This isn’t likely to be a compelling spatial computer. neither is the Apple Vision Pro | ||||||||