| ▲ | saalweachter 13 hours ago |
| Retailers don't, like, have to add sales tax on top of listed prices. They just have to pay it. |
|
| ▲ | syntheticnature 13 hours ago | parent | next [-] |
| No, it's illegal in many, looks like most states: https://www.avalara.com/blog/en/north-america/2019/07/retail... |
| |
| ▲ | cestith 12 hours ago | parent [-] | | IIRC, in New York it’s illegal to absorb sales tax on individual items because by law it’s a consumer tax collected by the business and explicitly not a tax on the business itself, but - and it’s a pretty big exception - anything sold as a bulk good can include the tax in the price. That includes things like liquid fuels, grains or candy by the scoop in the supermarket, loose sand/gravel/salt/whatever for outdoor use, and things like that. It’s been a long while since I had to set up an ecommerce site for New York though. | | |
| ▲ | 1718627440 9 hours ago | parent [-] | | Who actually pays the tax depends on the Elasticity of the consumer and the business. Who the law says it should be collected from, is really irrelevant. |
|
|
|
| ▲ | strbean 13 hours ago | parent | prev [-] |
| Now is our chance to switch to European style "you pay the price it says on the shelf"! |
| |
| ▲ | Galacta7 12 hours ago | parent | next [-] | | That makes too much sense, which is why it won't happen. Though I'd be all for it. | | |
| ▲ | Octoth0rpe 10 hours ago | parent [-] | | More specifically, if Americans stopped have a daily reminder of how much is paid in taxes (which IMO isn't egregious by any stretch), one party would have a tougher time whipping anti-tax sentiment. |
| |
| ▲ | EasyMark 6 hours ago | parent | prev [-] | | I don't think this will happen in our lifetimes. It's like not moving the day hour ahead/behind twice a year. A wholly stupid idea that will likely never be fixed on the federal level because of inertia. |
|