| ▲ | tedivm a day ago | |
Until the supreme court overturns that. | ||
| ▲ | tanjtanjtanj a day ago | parent | next [-] | |
They already did, more or less. The supreme court ruled that unless your case is virtually a carbon-copy of an existing Bivens case then it doesn't count. The current supreme court does not respect precedent in any meaningful way. | ||
| ▲ | thechao 10 hours ago | parent | prev [-] | |
Bivens act, not case. The act modifies the statutes. It's been read but not voted on. https://www.congress.gov/bill/117th-congress/senate-bill/334... | ||