| ▲ | hgomersall a day ago |
| No, it should move properly when passing by value (as in, essentially the rust move semantics). If you want a copy, that should be explicit. |
|
| ▲ | hyghjiyhu a day ago | parent [-] |
| Moving by default would be too much of a footgun without a borrow checker imo. |
| |
| ▲ | hgomersall 16 hours ago | parent | next [-] | | I think using a language without a borrow checker is already a massive footgun (albeit less of one for GC/RC languages). More sensible move semantics would still be a big ergonomic improvement. | |
| ▲ | kccqzy 11 hours ago | parent | prev [-] | | I think the language allowing use-after-move is honestly a smaller footgun than allowing using uninitialized memory or use-after-free. C++ already has the latter. |
|
