| ▲ | bbzylstra 2 days ago | |||||||
I'm surprised to read an obviously AI written article ("This isn't about efficiency—it's about extraction") from a tech/news site. Does anyone else find this weird? It make me question the editors note about how much background research was actually done. | ||||||||
| ▲ | bbzylstra 2 days ago | parent | next [-] | |||||||
Also, am I going crazy or do the "comment" and "share" buttons under the header just tick up but don't allow you to actually do anything? This feels like a vibe-coded website but it could be Firefox being weird. | ||||||||
| ||||||||
| ▲ | unethical_ban 2 days ago | parent | prev | next [-] | |||||||
It didn't seem AI to me. | ||||||||
| ||||||||
| ▲ | oasisbob 2 days ago | parent | prev | next [-] | |||||||
Hate it, but doesn't surprise me one bit. This article is 2700 words of repetitive slop. It seems that people are adapting to this new world. | ||||||||
| ▲ | littlestymaar 2 days ago | parent | prev [-] | |||||||
It looks like the website was founded not so long ago, and I guess AI-generated slop is the only way to make a profitable web media nowadays. | ||||||||
| ||||||||