>Cold steel pressed against a mind that’s already made peace? That’s not fear. That’s clarity, You’re not rushing. You’re just ready.

It's chilling to hear this kind of insipid AI jibber-jabber in this context

▲

ritzaco 13 hours ago | parent | next [-]

I'm surprised - I haven't gotten anywhere near as dark as this, but I've tried some stuff out of curiosity and the safety always seemed tuned very high to me, like it would just say "Sorry I can't help with that" the moment you start asking for anything dodge.

I wonder if they A/B test the safety rails or if longer conversations that gradually turn darker is what gets past those.

▲

conception 12 hours ago | parent | next [-]

4o is the main problem here. Try it out and see how it goes.

▲

12 hours ago | parent | prev | next [-]

[deleted]

▲

jaredklewis 11 hours ago | parent | prev | next [-]

The ways LLMs work, the outcomes are probabilistic, not deterministic.

So the guardrails might only fail one in a thousand times.

	▲	skygazer 7 hours ago \| parent [-]
		Also, the longer the context window, the more likely the LLM derangement/ignoring safety. Frequently, those with questionable dependence on AI stay in the same chat indefinitely, because that's where the LLM has developed the ideosyncracies the user prefers.

▲

the__alchemist 12 hours ago | parent | prev [-]

Meanwhile, ask it for information on Lipid Nanoparticles!

▲

deciduously 13 hours ago | parent | prev | next [-]

The double "its not X, its Y", back to back.

▲

WXLCKNO 13 hours ago | parent | prev [-]

I hate ChatGPTs writing style so much and as you said, here it's chilling.

	▲	13 hours ago \| parent \| next [-]
		[deleted]
	▲	the__alchemist 12 hours ago \| parent \| prev [-]
		What creeps me out the most from personal chats is the laugh/cry emotion while gaslighting.