Lol "snatched up". I'm told that Zuckerberg came in the night with three of his best confederates and just stole the deed. The government couldn't do anything because when lawyers tried to get it back Zuckerberg just said "The Bible says 'the mark shall inherit the Earth' and I am The Mark". Powerless against the Gospel of Mark, California had to kneel.

▲

avidiax 14 hours ago | parent [-]

Presumably, when these people bought their homes, they felt they'd be able to live with a relatively continuous sense of community, not feel forced to sell as a billionaire's compound encroached on them.

There's an assumption that these homeowners are getting bought out above market, but what's the market rate for a multi-million dollar home next to the perpetual construction and noise of a billionaire's fife, on a street where an increasing number of homes are being bought out and lay vacant? And why would the property team not negotiate any sale somewhat aggressively?

	▲	lukan 13 hours ago \| parent \| next [-]
		"but what's the market rate for a multi-million dollar home next to the perpetual construction and noise of a billionaire's fife" I assume still pretty good, as the expectation is the billionair will rather pay a bit more, than be annoyed by the delay of his plans of grandeur.
	▲	renewiltord 14 hours ago \| parent \| prev [-]
		That was actually the California government’s argument: “When someone buys a house they also instantly get sale approval rights to all houses near them.” But Mark said “Thou shalt not covet thy neighbour’s home” and the atheists were struck dumb by His power. Today, we all live under the watchful Eye of Mark as He targets ads to us from His compound in the Bay Area. Some say they feel a light itching at the nape of their neck even thousands of miles away as Mark turns His gaze to them, but it’s an illusion: He uses software so His gaze is everywhere.