| ▲ | bryanlarsen 14 hours ago | |||||||||||||
> There is no such thing as purity or correctness in language There certainly is, in the case of French and other languages that have a central authority defining what is pure and correct. Defining something as pure by fiat seems nonsensical, but the world is strange that way. Especially if it applies outside the jurisdiction. Why should the Parisian government get to declare that Quebecois is impure? | ||||||||||||||
| ▲ | umanwizard 13 hours ago | parent | next [-] | |||||||||||||
People massively overstate the power and influence of the Académie française. It is essentially just a cultural organization. Sure, it claims to officially regulate the French language, but its decisions are not actually binding on anyone, not even the government or the education system, and are in fact widely ignored. In actual practice, French is about as regulated as English is (i.e., not at all) and French people use tons of loanwords from various languages, especially English and Arabic. | ||||||||||||||
| ||||||||||||||
| ▲ | thrance 11 hours ago | parent | prev [-] | |||||||||||||
How I wish we could cut these reactionary fossils from our tax money. It is nonsensical, and should no longer exist. They are tasked with maintaining an "official" dictionary, but have only published 9 editions so far, in over 300 years. The last one, that was just finished (only took 45 years) misses very important words like "web", "mail" or "homophobie" because they're supposedly too recent, but somehow includes "woke". In a French dictionary. What a fucking joke. | ||||||||||||||