Using the word is implies you have definite, conclusive proof, but the only one is a number of phrases that you believe are tells for AI generated stuff, but is it really or are you only now paying extra attention to it?

It's better to stay neutral and say you suspect it may be AI generated.

And for everyone else, responsible disclosure of using AI tools to write stuff would be appreciated.

(this comment did not involve AI. I don't know how to write an emdash)

> Using the word is implies you have definite, conclusive proof, but the only one is a number of phrases that you believe are tells for AI generated stuff, but is it really or are you only now paying extra attention to it? It's better to stay neutral and say you suspect it may be AI generated.

Literally the first two sentences on the linked article:

> Disclosure: Certain sections of this content were grammatically refined/updated using AI assistance, as English is not my first language. Quite ironic, I know, given the subject being discussed.

Personally, I've read enough AI generated SEO spam that anything with the AI voice comes off as being inauthentic and spammy. I would much rather read something with the mistakes a non-native English speaker would make than something AI written/edited.

It looks like the author did in fact update their article to disclose AI use:

> Certain sections of this content were grammatically refined/updated using AI assistance

> I don't know how to write an emdash

Same here, and at this point I don’t think I will ever learn