| ▲ | ivl 3 days ago | |
I don't even think that case was from Cloudflare hosting, just providing DDOS protection. And it wasn't a Spanish government policy, but rather a single judge's order. | ||
| ▲ | benatkin 3 days ago | parent | next [-] | |
Via a proxy? Or some other kind of DDOS protection? If it's a proxy, that should be considered hosting. Cloudflare does provide APIs to look up security threats by IP addresses that could help with DDOS, and I wouldn't consider that hosting: https://developers.cloudflare.com/api/resources/intel/subres... | ||
| ▲ | sidewndr46 3 days ago | parent | prev | next [-] | |
This is like suggesting the policy of the United States is set by "just a panel of less than 10 judges" and not the Federal government. Not only is SCOTUS part of the US government, it may actually be the most powerful part of the Federal government | ||
| ▲ | em-bee 3 days ago | parent | prev | next [-] | |
judges are giving orders based on the law/policy of the country. so if a judge gives a bad order, then the cause is a bad policy/law, and the fix is not to replace the judge, but to change the law. | ||
| ▲ | bell-cot 3 days ago | parent | prev [-] | |
"Major consequences M, because of an order by judge J" is not a situation which lasts...unless the government is relatively happy with M. | ||