| ▲ | Dusseldorf 7 hours ago | |||||||
It absolutely did not. ChatGPT is free to use and most people I know have barely engaged with it beyond a few queries once or twice to try it. When the iPhone came out, nearly everyone I knew dumped hundreds of dollars to get one (or a droid) within 2 years. | ||||||||
| ▲ | bdangubic 7 hours ago | parent | next [-] | |||||||
“most people I know” argument always wins :) most people I know spend $500+/month and use ai 8-10/hrs per day | ||||||||
| ▲ | lukan 6 hours ago | parent | prev | next [-] | |||||||
"and most people I know have barely engaged with it beyond a few queries once or twice to try it." Have you recently spoken with the younger generation still in school? I doubt you find many there who just "have barely engaged with it". It is just too useful for all the generic school stuff, homework, assignments, etc. | ||||||||
| ▲ | hunter-gatherer 7 hours ago | parent | prev [-] | |||||||
Agree. The conversation behind "adoption" was totally different as well. I was a young Army private when the first iPhone was announced. Before that I remember the iPod touch and other MP3 players beingthe rage in the gym and what not. I distinctly remember in the gym we were talking about the iPhone, my friend had an iPod touch and we took turns holding it up to our faces like a phone, and sort of saying "weird, but yeah, this would work". Point being, when smart phones came out it there was anticipation of what it might be, sort of like a game console. ChatGPT et al was sort of sudden, and the use case is pretty one dimensional, and for average people, less exciting. It is basically a work-slop emitter, and _most people I know_ seem to agree with that. | ||||||||
| ||||||||