You posit:

> Why would I be paying all this money for this realistic telepresence when my shitbox HP laptop from Walmart has a perfectly serviceable webcam?

I gave a pretty straightforward answer for why this feature would exist in this product. People sometimes on this forums ask legitimate questions.

It's pretty clear you weren't, rather you're seeking an opportunity to merely push some tired agenda, likely tied to some personal vendetta, and you're doing a pretty piss-poor job of it.

You say that me making you justify the third dimension is bad faith arguing, but you never even attempted to justify it. You actually do have to justify it because so many 3D technologies have been market duds. VR gaming sputtered into decline, 3D televisions died off, glasses-free 3D is nowhere to be found anymore after the 3DS and that crazy Red smartphone…you actually very much do have to justify that there’s demand for this new paradigm.

> VR/AR headsets are useful for working on and demonstrating many things

What things?

> that we've had to compromise to fit into a 2D paradigm.

What compromises?

> Being able to be present with that 3D model has clear advantages over using, for example, a mouse with a 2D equivalent or a 3D projection.

What advantages?

I think if this was even a niche representation of the future we’d see specialized companies with 3D-oriented software like Autodesk jumping all over the the Vision Pro specifically, but they seem to be nowhere to be found. All the key players in the industry besides Meta have basically bailed, including Microsoft and Google shutting down commercial/industrial solutions that had previously been touted as successful.

I have no vendetta here, I just think that full immersion VR was the wrong play for productivity and general computing. I think that the full immersion VR market is dying and that solutions like Meta Ray-Bans and VITURE glasses are way more palatable because they are way more “normal,” including the way they eschew these moonshot paradigm-shifting technologies that might actually work very well, but nobody asked for.

Nobody wants to be a 3D avatar and work inside a headset where your view of the outside world is desaturated by cameras because it’s cringe and weird.

As a side note I will also point out that if you use a Vision Pro with a MacBook to use the secondary screen functionality (required for writing code or running apps outside the App Store) you’re basically doing the exact same thing as VITURE glasses except you paid 10x more and your battery life sucks. And you can just join a standard conference call on your glasses and essentially look normal.