The great thing is the models are sufficiently different enough, that when multiple come to the same conclusion, there is a good chance that conclusion is bound by real data.

And I think this is the advice that should always be doled out when using them for anything mission critical, legal, etc.

▲

gitremote 12 hours ago | parent [-]

All the models are pre-trained on the same one Internet.

	▲	brandall10 11 hours ago \| parent [-]
		"Bound by real data" meaning not hallucinations, which is by far the bigger issue when it comes to "be an expert that does x" that doesn't have a real capability to say "I don't know". The chance of different models hallucinating the same plausible sounding but incorrect building codes, medical diagnoses, etc, would be incredible unlikely, due to arch differences, training approaches, etc. So when two concur in that manner, unless they're leaning heavily on the same poisoned datasets, there's a healthy chance the result is correct based on a preponderance of known data.