| ▲ | bronlund 17 hours ago | |||||||
It was most likely in the specs from the beginning. You can't have busses roaming around with no way to turn them off remotely. | ||||||||
| ▲ | Tor3 16 hours ago | parent | next [-] | |||||||
"You can't have busses roaming around with no way to turn them off remotely." Hm? Not a single bus on the road in my city can be turned off remotely. There's never been one ever, since bus transport started. So why should, no, must, that be a feature of new buses? | ||||||||
| ||||||||
| ▲ | donkers 17 hours ago | parent | prev | next [-] | |||||||
I’m pretty sure turning off the bus is something the bus driver can do. It’s not like buses were wildly roaming around before cellular networks were invented… | ||||||||
| ▲ | secondcoming 17 hours ago | parent | prev | next [-] | |||||||
Yes, those wild buses on the loose have been a major problem | ||||||||
| ||||||||
| ▲ | asplake 17 hours ago | parent | prev | next [-] | |||||||
Can't you? And who should have that power? I believe that this is the concern. | ||||||||
| ▲ | IAmBroom 16 hours ago | parent | prev | next [-] | |||||||
What? That's the way it's always been. Do you imagine some benevolent authority sits in your town with a finger on the kill switch for every vehicle in motion? If it were in the specs from the beginning, there would be no issue. This isn't a "click here to accept" thing; multiple people scan the technical data in these projects. | ||||||||
| ▲ | drykjdryj 15 hours ago | parent | prev [-] | |||||||
Better than a bus that are blown up if it goes under 50 mph. | ||||||||