| ▲ | adsharma 19 hours ago | |||||||||||||||||||||||||
++spy ethos and ideas But why limit to an interpreter? Translate to other excellent compiled languages and benefit from the optimization work there. Giving up on C-API and the dynamic parts of python that 1% of the people use is a good trade-off. In the age of cursor and windsurf it's not hard to auto replace incompatible code with something that works in the static-py ecosystem. Would love to participate in an effort to standardize such a subset. | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| ▲ | rich_sasha 19 hours ago | parent | next [-] | |||||||||||||||||||||||||
I'd imagine a lot of packages that you may want to use make deep use of some of these obscure features. So much magical "it just works" of Django is surely various kinds of deep introspection. Not sure an AI can fix it yet. It's not just adding type annotations. | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| ||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| ▲ | nusl 19 hours ago | parent | prev [-] | |||||||||||||||||||||||||
There is a compiler detailed in the page on the link; > 3. We have a compiler for deployment and performance. The interpreter and the compiler are guaranteed to produce the exact same results at runtime. | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| ||||||||||||||||||||||||||