I don't have to explain because judges will do it for me: https://www.whitecase.com/insight-alert/two-california-distr...

On summary judgment too, which means the plaintiffs really had no case. Not surprising because it's the most obvious fair use ever under transformative work. So obvious that I have a hard time taking arguments to the contrary seriously and just assume they are driven by bitterness. Not that anything I have ever heard on that side actually rises to the level of an argument. Your opinion, and everyone else on this thread that agrees with you, falls under your own statement:

> Seems you keep repeating the same stance all over thread, without a single explanation why your opinion should be a valid one.