| ▲ | greatgib a day ago | |
This looks like to suck so high. If Epic accepts that, they will have solved their case without fixing the issue that we were all hoping for. Google would settle with their terms but that are still quite bad as I see it. Like if you were to install an app like f-droid from the store, it's not only the app that would be subject to Google terms but all the one installed later by f-droid. Also, this would prevent the justice to set the precedent that Google actions are not ok. The case would still be "undecided". And regarding what is proposed, I would be surprised that Epic is satisfied with a settlement that is limited in time to 2032. Especially a "short" duration like that. I don't remember when the first trial started but a case like this in justice can easily take 7 years all by itself. | ||
| ▲ | pjmlp a day ago | parent | next [-] | |
That was obvious from the start, anyone that thinks Epic is some kind of white knight deserves the same outcome as those that believed in "Do no evil" motto from Google's marketing team. | ||
| ▲ | BoredPositron a day ago | parent | prev | next [-] | |
[flagged] | ||
| ▲ | kotaKat a day ago | parent | prev [-] | |
[flagged] | ||