I wouldn't hold my breath. Competing models seem to top out around 120 Hz but at lower resolutions. I don't imagine there's a universal push for higher refresh rates in this segment anyway. My calibrated displays run at 60 Hz, and I'm happy with that. Photos don't really move much, y'know.

▲

eviks a day ago | parent | next [-]

> Photos don't really move much, y'know.

They do when you move them (scroll)

▲

justsomehnguy a day ago | parent [-]

And?

Can you provide a ROI point for scrolling photos at 120Hz+ ?

	▲	klausa a day ago \| parent \| next [-]
		It looks and feels much better to many (but not all) people. I don't really know how you expect that to translate into a ROI point.
	▲	eviks a day ago \| parent \| prev [-]
		Sure, give me your ROI point for an extra pixel and I can fit refresh rate in there.

▲

klausa a day ago | parent | prev [-]

I imagine your mouse still moves plenty though.

	▲	ryukoposting 20 hours ago \| parent [-]
		If "the mouse looks nice" is the selling point, I'm not sold.