I'm saying you'd object to being treated like an LLM and don't really have conviction when you make these claims.

I'd also say stringing together A.I. buzzwords (input output) to describe humans isn't really an argument so much as what philosophers call a category error.

That I wouldn’t treat a human like an LLM is completely irrelevant to the topic.

Input and output are not AI buzzwords, they’re fundamental terms in computation. The argument that human beings are computational has been alive in philosophy since the 1940’s brother…