[flagged]

Yeah, if it weren't for USAID then the CIA wouldn't have had any cover for smuggling those weapons and would have just given up.

The argument is like saying "criminals used this bank to transfer stolen money so the bank is bad and I'm glad they were shut down." USAID has done far more good than the harm they were exploited to enable.

	▲	drysine a day ago \| parent [-]
		>criminals used this bank to transfer stolen money so the bank is bad If a bank willingly cooperates with criminals it is a bad bank, yes.

▲

snowwrestler 2 days ago | parent | prev | next [-]

Not sure if this is intended to be critical or supportive. A lot of Americans supported these types of efforts to oppose the Soviet Union. There’s a Tom Hanks movie about it, for example.

	▲	drysine a day ago \| parent [-]
		Because they were lied to by American mass media that presented mujahedeen as freedom fighters. When 9/11 happened Americans suddenly found themselves on the receiving end and stopped being supportive of Islamic extremists.

▲

Angostura 2 days ago | parent | prev | next [-]

And a vaccination programme was used as a front when searching for Bin Ladin. That doesn’t mean that vaccine programs are bad. Anything can be used as a front

	▲	drysine a day ago \| parent [-]
		>That doesn’t mean that vaccine programs are bad. Obviously. But the organization that discredits vaccine programs by being a front for CIA is bad and deserves to be dismantled.

▲

2 days ago | parent | prev [-]

[deleted]