| ▲ | gilbetron 2 days ago | |||||||
This is one of the least curious posts I've seen on HN. We have been thinking about thinking for millenia, and no, Buddhists don't have it figure out. Nobody does. LLMs are the most significant advancement in "thinking science" in a long, long time. It is clear that they are doing something a lot like thinking, if it is not thinking. They seem to think more than most people I know, including the person I'm responding to. I think people conflate thinking with sentience, consciousness, and a whole lot of other concerns. Clearly this website is not for you and your complete lack of curiosity if you call us "sicko freaks". | ||||||||
| ▲ | nickledave 2 days ago | parent [-] | |||||||
> "thinking science" If you are really curious, I invite you to read this cognitive science paper, "Modern Alchemy: Neurocognitive Reverse Engineering": https://philsci-archive.pitt.edu/25289/1/GuestEtAl2025.pdf Note the quote at the top from Abeba Birhane: > We can only presume to build machines like us once we see ourselves as machines first. It reminds me of your comment that > [LLMs] seem to think more than most people I know and I have to say that I am really sad that you feel this way. I hope you can find better people to spend your time with. You might find other recent papers from the first author interesting. Perhaps it will help you understand that there are a lot of deeply curious people in the world that are also really fucking sick of our entire culture being poisoned by intellectual e-waste from Silicon Valley. | ||||||||
| ||||||||