Don't "no coders" find the concepts described in this article imdimitating?

The article states that whatever the article is trying to describe "Takes about ~20-30 mins. The cognitive load is high....". while their literal actual step of "Googling "ffmpeg combine static image and audio."" gives you the literal command you need to run from a known source (superuser.com sourced from ffmpeg wiki).

Anyone even slightly familiar with ffmpeg should be able to produce the same result in minutes. For someone who doesn't understand what ffmpeg is the article means absolutely nothing. How does a "no coder" understand what a "agent in a sandboxed container" is?

▲

shardullavekar 2 days ago | parent [-]

we took a basic example and described it. (will try adding a complex one)

we have our designer/intern in our minds who creates shorts, adds subtiles, crops them,and merges the audio generated. He is aware of ffmpeg and prefers using a SaaS UI on top of it.

However, we see him hanging out on chatgpt, or gemini all the time. He is literally the no coder we have in mind.

We just combined his type what you want + ffmpeg workflows.

▲

EraYaN 2 days ago | parent [-]

Wouldn't that intern just use an NLE (be it Premiere, Davinci Resole etc) anyway? If you need to style subtitles and edit shorts and video content, you'll need a proper editor anyway.

	▲	shardullavekar 2 days ago \| parent [-]
		1. download a larger video from s3. 2. Use NLE and cut it into shorts. (crop, resize, subtitles etc.) 3. Upload shorts on YouTube, Instagram, Tiktok. He does use davinci resolve but only for 2. NLEs make ffmpeg a standalone yet easy to use tool. Not denying that major heavy lifting is done by the NLE. We go a step ahead and make it embeddable in a larger workflow.