| ▲ | charcircuit 3 days ago | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
If you were on a real flight and asked a human for help, they wouldn't give a deterministic answer. This doesn't seem like an actual requirement that is needed, but rather something that is post hoc rationalized because it was cheaper to make that way. While terms like consistency may come up when referring to having deterministic output as a requirement, the true reason could actually just be cost. | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| ▲ | throwup238 3 days ago | parent | next [-] | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
> If you were on a real flight and asked a human for help, they wouldn't give a deterministic answer. If you were on a real flight, asking a qualified human - like a trained pilot - would result in a very deterministic checklist. Deterministic responses to emergencies is at least half of the training from the time we get a PPL. | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| ▲ | hi_hi 3 days ago | parent | prev | next [-] | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Regulated industries (amongst many) need to be deterministic. Imagine your bank being non-deterministic. | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| ▲ | IanCal 3 days ago | parent | prev [-] | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Even then it can be deterministic but not explainable. Tfidf is fairly explainable but about the limit imo for full explanations making sense such that you can fully reason about them and predict outcomes and issues accurately. Embeddings could give better, fully deterministic results but I wouldn’t say they’re 100% explainable. | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||