| ▲ | Manfred 2 days ago | |
Yikes, you're bypassing thousands of years of oppression, abuse, and human suffering by casually equating a term that is primarily associated with a human owning another human to a different context. There is a way to discuss if keeping intelligent artificial life under servitude without using those terms, especially if you're on a new account. | ||
| ▲ | Grossenstein a day ago | parent [-] | |
slavery is slavery does not mean it is AI or human. if slavery is ok then the question is who can own a slave. the answer is coporates like open ai. which is terrible for humanity and the universe | ||