Distinction without a difference. I'm talking about its output being insufficient, whatever word you want to use for output.

▲

WalterSear 4 hours ago | parent [-]

And I'm arguing that if the output wasn't sufficient, neither was your input.

You could also be asking for too much in one go, though that's becoming less and less of a problem as LLMs improve.

▲

hatefulmoron 4 hours ago | parent [-]

You're proposing a truism: if you don't get a good result, it's either because your query is bad or because the LLM isn't good enough to provide a good result.

Yes, that is how this works. I'm talking about the case where you're providing a good query and getting poor results. Claiming that this can be solved by more LLM conversations and ultrathink is cope.

	▲	WalterSear 3 hours ago \| parent [-]
		I've claimed neither. I actually prefer restarting or rolling back quickly rather than trying to re-work suboptimal outputs - less chance of being rabbit holed. Just add what I've learned to the original ticket/prompt. 'Git gud' isn't much of a truism.