| ▲ | drewbug01 3 days ago | |||||||
Why do you believe DHS is speaking honestly here? Available reporting indicates that judge ruled on Thursday, and that DHS deported on Friday. Moreover, available reporting also indicates: > DHS and ICE did not respond to questions from The Associated Press seeking additional details on the timeline and how officials receive federal court orders. So they aren’t clarifying anything. Odd. And don’t forget back in March, when the administration publicly asserted that oral orders from a judge carried no authority and that they would only heed written orders. When you put those two together, one wonders: perhaps DHS is playing fast and loose with timelines again. Why on earth would you treat anything they say as if it were truthful or reliable? They have lost the right to be treated as trustworthy by default. | ||||||||
| ▲ | refurb 2 days ago | parent [-] | |||||||
Are you suggesting a government agency is just making things up in official communications? If that’s the case you must also assume the deportee is lying as well? Between the two it’s the deportee who has the bigger incentive to make things up. If we’re going to go with those assumptions there is no point in even discussing it because neither of have any facts to base an argument on. | ||||||||
| ||||||||