| ▲ | binary132 3 days ago | |
I’m having a hard time envisioning a project that could be killed by choosing Scala that wasn’t actually killed by bad engineering. Scala is pretty easy to write Just Simpler Java in…. | ||
| ▲ | JuniperMesos 2 days ago | parent | next [-] | |
I would say that Scala is more complicated than Java because it introduces a number of useful new features to a JVM language. | ||
| ▲ | cozzyd 2 days ago | parent | prev | next [-] | |
Perhaps it's running on a semi-embedded system... | ||
| ▲ | xwolfi 2 days ago | parent | prev [-] | |
The fact that it's simpler Java makes it a good candidate for failure: it tries to remove from the code enough to make it hard to maintain. | ||