| ▲ | cmiles8 3 days ago |
| Amazon is a bit late to the announcements party on this front so this comes across as a bit “hey guys, us too!” Lots of questions on if this makes sense, and highly likely Amazon never gets $38B cash from OpenAI out of this. |
|
| ▲ | mocha_nate 3 days ago | parent | next [-] |
| i think this shows Amazon filling a need Microsoft couldn't. They probably tried, but decided to use Amazon cloud services after reviewing infrastructure needs. |
| |
| ▲ | Handy-Man 3 days ago | parent [-] | | MSFT is power constrained.[0] [0] https://www.tomshardware.com/tech-industry/artificial-intell... | | |
| ▲ | mike_d 3 days ago | parent [-] | | Everyone is. The grids always had a problem supplying enough power to even modestly sized commercial datacenters. This is what kicked off the trend of companies building their own datacenters in obscure cities that used to house large steel mills or other power hungry businesses. I remember when everyone was racing to produce "datacenter in a shipping container" solutions. I just laughed because apparently nobody actually bothered to check if you could actually plug it in anywhere. | | |
| ▲ | bespokedevelopr 3 days ago | parent [-] | | Amazon still does this. The customers aren’t saas companies in the bay though. It’s militaries, and they’re sent to FOBs. |
|
|
|
|
| ▲ | ahmeneeroe-v2 3 days ago | parent | prev [-] |
| >"hey guys, us too!" In what context? This isn't fashion, being the 2nd mover has benefits which often outweigh the costs. |