>captured in a illegal way

Tracked down in an illegal way? Sure, quite possibly. But he's going to get a trial. If he were kidnapped out of Italy by the CIA or something, it seems like it would be hard to keep that from coming out.

▲

aswegs8 4 days ago | parent | next [-]

Why should the CIA need to kidnap someone from Italy if they can just provide info about the person to the Italian govt so he gets arrested and extradited?

▲

serallak 4 days ago | parent | next [-]

Well about that ...

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Abu_Omar_case

This is well know case of a "person of interest" kidnapped by the CIA in Milano, Italy. While the CIA was assisted by the Italian Intelligence, it was a completely illegal operation, without any due process or judiciary oversight.

▲

rasz 4 days ago | parent | prev | next [-]

Because Italy has a history of siding with terrorists and letting them go

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Achille_Lauro_hijacking#Jurisd...

"Following a deal made with Yasser Arafat with Giulio Andreotti[25] even before the Craxi government had made its final decision, Abbas and Badrakkan, wearing unidentified uniforms, had been put back on the EgyptAir 737 airliner."

▲

Cthulhu_ 4 days ago | parent | prev | next [-]

If the CIA is involved it wouldn't be any regular criminal, but e.g. an international spy, someone who may even be protected by Italy for ??? reasons.

	▲	hnbad 4 days ago \| parent [-]
		Sure but "not a regular criminal" is a much broader group than you make it out to be. Remember the CIA was also the primary actor involved in the US's overseas bombing attacks, especially outside active war zones. Sure, a lot of the bombings targeted "terrorists" but that designation is ultimately arbitrary - especially if we're talking about people being killed in bombings of civilian areas that usually came with a lot of collateral damage (especially if you don't use the assumption that anyone who may have been a teenage or adult male is an enemy combatant), a practice that we would identify as "terrorism" if carried out by any hostile regime. He doesn't seem to have big enough of a target on his back to justify outright exploding him but that doesn't mean he's considered a "regular criminal" or that the CIA wasn't involved. That said, Occam's razor suggests it didn't require CIA involvement to catch him - he may just have been careless and unlucky.

▲

stefantalpalaru 4 days ago | parent | prev [-]

[dead]

▲

manquer 4 days ago | parent | prev [-]

I wasn't talking about this specific case.

It was about general statement by the parent on how these criminals can be so be dumb, i was enumerating some of the different ways it can happen behind the scenes and still be annouced as a simple arrest at the airport etc.