| ▲ | instagraham 4 days ago | |
This is why I harp about platforms needing to become decentralised and un-censorable. I was hoping the fediverse could become something in that direction but I'd also had hopes for things like IPFS, Matrix (Element I think used to host videos), DLive, SteemIT, etc. User adoption and network effects are really the only limiting factors - but as people get more disillusioned with Meta and X, there is always a space for competing platforms. I take an Occam's Razor to the usual arguments against it - the problems these create (fake news, slander, etc) are already prominent in regulated media platforms, which also rely on community moderation as a result. The solutions it enables (space for fearless/citizen reporting, Streisand effects for censorship rather than big-tech powered banhammers) are wholly absent in regulated media. Besides tech, and going by the press freedom index, one's only hope for good journalism today would be to incorporate in New Zealand. But you'd still have to face the odds of your content being banned in the countries they report on. The other issue with the anti-press efforts by governments is that it weaponises the state against on-ground journalism and ends up encouraging out-of-country reporting as a result. | ||
| ▲ | burningChrome 4 days ago | parent | next [-] | |
>> but as people get more disillusioned with Meta and X, there is always a space for competing platforms. Diaspora way back when had a chance to take hold of the flame and do some damage to Meta. Even after it was released, I moved to it immediately. Nobody from any other social platform would join me. Its one thing to create a decentralized platform, its quite another to overcome the network effect where friends and family and have other friends and family and they can't move now because none of their friends or family will move. This is why there was a very narrow window before Meta became the juggernaut it is today to get people to move to a more decentralized platform. Now? Close to 100% impossible to win that game - regardless of the opportunity for freedom from censorship and government overreach. There will be small pockets of people moving to them, but there's a good chance we will never see the kind of numbers that Meta, X, YouTube or other platforms have right now. They are just so entrenched at this point. | ||
| ▲ | godelski 4 days ago | parent | prev | next [-] | |
Isn't Threads now federated? I just heard about it, I don't use Threads though or much outside HN | ||
| ▲ | inglor_cz 4 days ago | parent | prev [-] | |
This is why I harp about platforms needing to become decentralised and un-censorable I wish people could handle such platforms responsibly. In practice, the first decentralised and un-censorable platform will be immediately overrun with CP and drug emporia. And I say this as someone who appreciates civic freedoms and libertarianism... Some people are genuinely shitty and have an "anti-Midas touch" which turns everything they touch to shit. | ||