| ▲ | jonway 4 days ago | |||||||
No, the right wing fielded opposition to the real ID laws. See this 2008 CATO report[0]. There was a bipartisan movement against this at the time. But yes, far less bothered by stingrays, ALPR national surveillance, etc in more recent times. I just want to give people their dues on this. For example Rand Paul introduced the Justice for Breonna Taylor Act which would have banned no-knock warrants if it had passed.[1] [0] https://www.cato.org/policy-report/july/august-2008/real-id-... | ||||||||
| ▲ | mindslight 4 days ago | parent [-] | |||||||
> Rand Paul introduced the Justice for Breonna Taylor Act which would have banned no-knock warrants if it had passed Yes, Rand Paul deserves credit for this. But isn't he basically like an exception that proves the rule? The 2005 vote on the REAL ID ACT was 218 Yea 9 Nay for Republicans, and 42 Yea 152 Nay for Democrats. Ron Paul was one of those Nays. He deserves credit along with the other 8. But overall, it was still a Republican bill. That's what my original comment was referring to. And it's great that Republican opposition to REAL ID built. But of course the immediate question is how much of that opposition was due to being bored with Bush, and having a Democratic administration on the horizon? Just like the dishonest appeals to fiscal responsibility during Democratic administrations. Because while it's important to give credit and look to build pro-freedom coalitions, it's also important to call out the rank hypocrisy. And rank hypocrisy seems to be the entire platform of the Republican party these days. For example, I don't see any of these purported 2nd amendment enthusiasts forming militias to defend their states against the federalized abduction squads. | ||||||||
| ||||||||