| ▲ | lunar_rover 4 days ago | ||||||||||||||||
The problem is still the desktop itself. Basically none of the existing Linux desktop components are mature, either design or technical wise and more often than not, both. Deck works because most games are self contained, allowing them to have a default game mode that bypasses the desktop entirely. | |||||||||||||||||
| ▲ | drnick1 4 days ago | parent | next [-] | ||||||||||||||||
> Basically none of the existing Linux desktop components are mature, either design or technical wise and more often than not, both. What do you have in mind specifically? GNOME 3 is very mature, and has a consistent, polished design that far surpasses Windows 11. In fact, in view of recent macOS redesigns, I am tempted to say that it surpassed it too. | |||||||||||||||||
| ▲ | embedding-shape 4 days ago | parent | prev | next [-] | ||||||||||||||||
They can ship the same destop/window manager combo they ship on the Steam Deck, where you can switch between the "full screen mode" (don't remember what it's called) and a proper desktop. I'm sure most people stay in the full-screen mode, it has all the settings and everything, even works with an cursor if I'm not mistaken, but can fallback when you need a terminal or whatever. | |||||||||||||||||
| |||||||||||||||||
| ▲ | antod 4 days ago | parent | prev | next [-] | ||||||||||||||||
Linux had mature stable desktop stacks in the past, but they kinda sucked. Churn (and consequent ongoing immaturity) seems to be the price we've paid in the last 10-15yrs of "progress" making them suck less. I hope it settles down a bit soon and we get to enjoy more longer term polish on these improvements though. | |||||||||||||||||
| ▲ | 0xDEAFBEAD 4 days ago | parent | prev [-] | ||||||||||||||||
10 years ago Linus pointed out that most distros willingly break application compatibility all the time: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Pzl1B7nB9Kc I'm not really following desktop Linux, is Linus' assessment still accurate? | |||||||||||||||||