No, really, there are fewer famines. The UN, who defined poverty in terms of basic necessities, had to review their definition because how do you make UN survive if there weren’t enough poor populations in scope.

▲

Tarsul 4 days ago | parent [-]

yeah but what's it worth if our riches in 2025 are lent from the future with no way to pay back? That's climate change.

	▲	eastbound 4 days ago \| parent [-]
		Shifting the goal. The goal was commiseration for poverty, and you want a stable future. It’s difficult to reconcile the desires of 8bn people. Some don’t care about climate change, some would like to see their granddaughter, some will live through flooding or an earthquake, some would like better health. Most of misery in the world does not come from the lack of money. If anything, disagreements between people are the cause of the lack of money, not the result.