| |
| ▲ | elondaits 5 days ago | parent | next [-] | | It’s possible to lose one’s irises. Most identical twins have almost identical DNA. Then there’s the “right to be forgotten”, people on witness protection, refugees and immigrants who enter the system as adults, etc. I don’t think there’s an easy technical solution. | | |
| ▲ | DANmode 5 days ago | parent [-] | | Blind twins* will need to carry an alternative. /s Of course the technical solution isn’t easy, (or necessarily all good), but that doesn’t make it any less likely, or intriguing to discuss the roadmap. (You combine the scanned data together from both of those scans, regardless of value, as your recovery mechanism, by the way - accounting for abnormal anatomy in a defined, reproducible way is a challenge, not a barrier) |
| |
| ▲ | DANmode 5 days ago | parent | prev [-] | | // > allows users to regain access to their funds without a traditional seed phrase by leveraging trusted contacts (guardians) and a predefined recovery protocol. If a user loses access, they coordinate with a quorum of these guardians, who each provide a piece of the necessary information to restore | | |
| ▲ | justinclift 5 days ago | parent [-] | | > they coordinate with a quorum of these guardians Hmmm, that sounds like it would fail outright in some severe edge cases. For example mass casualty events (fire, earthquake, war, etc) that only leaves a few survivors. | | |
| ▲ | DANmode 5 days ago | parent [-] | | Definitely. Those events require special government attention and cost anyway. Getting Grandma's taxes paid? Not so much. Or: shouldn't! (The idea is to remove as much user and support burden as possible, not solve societies woes, haha) |
|
|
|
