Ok I take your point. However, it is possible to generate a middling review paper combining ai generated slop and edits. Maybe we would be tricked by it in certain circumstances. I don't mean to imply these outputs are something I would value reading. I am just arguing in favour of the proposed approach of arXiv.

> it is possible to generate a middling review paper combining ai generated slop and edits

If you’re an expert. If you’re not, you’ll publish, best case, bullshit. (Worst case lies.)