Articles like this leave me with an uneasy feeling that the “solutions” are just blind workarounds - more debugging/research should be able to expose exactly what the problem is, now that would be something worth sharing.

▲

kccqzy 6 days ago | parent | next [-]

Articles like this give me the feeling that the author did a little bit of research and shared a suboptimal solution, and was hoping that experts on HN would present better solutions. Wasn't there a saying about how the best way to get correct answers is to post not just the question but the wrong answers to it?

	▲	npodbielski 5 days ago \| parent \| next [-]
		If something is stupid but it works then it is not stupid. If this will help them find a solution then sure why not. Though I am wondering if this would not be easier to just use postgress and focus on features instead.
	▲	6 days ago \| parent \| prev \| next [-]
		[deleted]
	▲	apitman 5 days ago \| parent \| prev [-]
		Cunningham's Law

▲

Daniel_sk 5 days ago | parent | prev [-]

I am pretty sure in this case even Claude or ChatGPT would give them the correct answer quickly or at least it would point them to the right direction (the busy-timeout pragma) with 5 minutes of work.