If all that is true, why do professional photography monitors pretty much exclusively have matte finishes. Same for monitor used by video, CAD or 3d professionals.

You guys need to stop reading apple advertisement material and take it for gospel just because it has some fancy scientific words in it.

▲

zenmac 6 days ago | parent | next [-]

Matte is always being the fancier option in Photography paper, glossy photograph just looks cheap.

	▲	WesolyKubeczek 6 days ago \| parent [-]
		Interesting, given that in the older days of analog dark room development, you had to use a special kind of paper and heat-press it against a polished surface when drying to get a glossy photo. I always thought matte photos were more readable, but glossy used to be more wow and have “deeper blacks”.

▲

DANmode 5 days ago | parent | prev [-]

Color distortion and/or glare not worth marginal gains that cheap displays rely on the gloss for.