| ▲ | seemaze 6 days ago | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Do you prefer glossy paper work? glossy book pages? glossy construction documents? The preference for a non-reflective surface for the relaying of dense information has been established for decades. You know what's glossy? Movie posters and postcards. | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| ▲ | elliottkember 6 days ago | parent | next [-] | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Paper, books, and construction documents all use reflected and not refracted light. | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| ▲ | seemaze 6 days ago | parent | prev | next [-] | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
ooh, my feathers were a bit ruffled (for reasons unrelated) when I wrote the above. I still say for comfortable all day viewing and productivity, there is no comparison. Glossy does have more pop on a phone or watching movies in the dark, but I'd go blind doing that all day every day.. | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| ▲ | dmitrygr 6 days ago | parent | prev [-] | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
non-reflective surfaces you cite have pigments on TOP. screens have depth causing parallax and light spreading. Your point would be valid if screens were paper-thin and image pixels came out the very surface | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||