Nope. Blockchain has no anonymity.

You don't have to attribute any name to the transaction, just a voting booth ID and the vote. The actual benefit is just that it is hard to tamper and easy to trace where tampering happened.

But I still prefer the paper vote and I usually a blockchain apathetic.

▲

johnsonelephant 5 days ago | parent | prev | next [-]

Monero demonstrates a solution (https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Ring_signature)

▲

fancyswimtime 5 days ago | parent | prev [-]

wouldn't that be a feature in this case?

▲

kaibee 5 days ago | parent | next [-]

Anonymous voting means that you can't sell your vote. Like, if I pay you $5 to vote for X, but I can't actually verify that you voted for X and not Y, then I wouldn't bother trying. Or if I'm your boss and I want you to vote for X... etc.

▲

konimex 5 days ago | parent | prev [-]

Not really. Your ballot should be secret, which goes against blockchain, I guess.

▲

ehnto 5 days ago | parent [-]

The blockchain doesn't require your ID, just the voting station ID.

	▲	Sammi 5 days ago \| parent [-]
		Any id can be correlated.