| ▲ | iamwil 10 days ago | |||||||
Lately, I've been writing more on my blog, and it's been helpful to change the way that I do it. Now, I take a cue from school, and write the outline first. With an outline, I can use a prompt for the LLM to play the role of a development editor to help me critique the throughline. This is helpful because I tend to meander, if I'm thinking at the level of words and sentences, rather than at the level of an outline. Once I've edited the outline for a compelling throughline, I can then type out the full essay in my own voice. I've found it much easier to separate the process into these two stages. Before outline critiquing: https://interjectedfuture.com/destroyed-at-the-boundary/ After outline critiquing: https://interjectedfuture.com/the-best-way-to-learn-might-be... I'm still tweaking the developement editor. I find that it can be too much of a stickler on the form of the throughline. | ||||||||
| ▲ | whshdjsk 10 days ago | parent [-] | |||||||
And yet, Will, with all due respect, I can’t hear your voice in any of the 10 articles I skimmed. It’s the same rhetorical structure found in every other LLM blog. I suppose if to make you feel like it’s better (even if it isn’t), and you enjoy it, go ahead. But know this: we can tell. | ||||||||
| ||||||||