| ▲ | noir_lord 10 days ago | ||||||||||||||||
I think it does, We could get a robotic arm to paint in the style of a Dutch master but it'd not be a Dutch master. I'd sooner have a ship painting from the little shop in the village with the little old fella who paints them in the shop than a perfect robotic simulacrum of a Rembrandt. Intention matters but it matters less sometimes but I think it matters. Writing is communication, it's one of the things we as humans do that makes us unique - why would I want to reduce that to a machine generating it or read it when it has. | |||||||||||||||||
| ▲ | yoyohello13 10 days ago | parent | next [-] | ||||||||||||||||
I’ve been learning piano and I’ve noticed a similar thing with music. You can listen to perfect machine generated performances of songs and there is just something missing. A live performance even of a master pianist will have little ‘mistakes’ or interpretations that make the whole performance so much more enjoyable. Not only that, but just knowing that a person spent months drilling a song adds something. | |||||||||||||||||
| |||||||||||||||||
| ▲ | cubefox 10 days ago | parent | prev [-] | ||||||||||||||||
That's also why in The Matrix (1999) the main character takes the red pill (facing grim reality) rather than the blue pill (forgetting about grim reality and going back to a happy illusion). | |||||||||||||||||
| |||||||||||||||||