| |
| ▲ | hansmayer 12 hours ago | parent | next [-] | | On dictionaries: you're the one who insisted on dictionaries, only to produce wikipedia links instead :) Now how is it bias? Well, it's in your own answer. You are literally claiming things based on what you believe them to be, not based on what they likely are. For the latter, we'd need a longer timespan and more usage data. So you fiddled with it a bit in a timespan of a week or so and based on this tiny sample, came to a conclusion, that as you specify is your belief, but not really hard data. That is quintessentially what a bias is. Or to borrow from Mirriam-Webster again: an inclination of temperament or outlook
especially : a personal and sometimes unreasoned judgment : prejudice | | |
| ▲ | simonw 12 hours ago | parent [-] | | I assumed bias was meant to mean I'm biased towards Anthropic, or to reflect some other unfair semi-hidden agenda that influences my writing. I do have a relevant bias here I guess: I'm biased towards the pattern of granting an LLM the ability to execute commands in a Unix-style environment. I've been a huge fan of that approach ever since ChatGPT Code Interpreter launched in early 2023 and I'm excited that skills further solidifies why that pattern is such a good bet. | | |
| ▲ | hansmayer 11 hours ago | parent [-] | | Well, personally I believe you don't have any ulterior motives here. But be warned - when you hype up stuff like that and aligns perfectly with the interests of Anthropic (or whatever other VC-propped GenAI company), it can certainly come across the wrong way. Take this feedback as an indicator to help you steer your writing, not as a personal attack. |
|
| |
| ▲ | cindyllm 11 hours ago | parent | prev [-] | | [dead] |
|
