▲ | drawfloat a day ago | |||||||
Setting aside whether it’s true, that’s not a thought crime by any definition. | ||||||||
▲ | grayhatter 14 hours ago | parent [-] | |||||||
The argument as I understood it was 4chan's existence, degrades society. 4chan's whole gimmick is that you can say whatever you want, because you don't have to identify yourself when you say it. It's a way for Internet denizens scream their intrusive thoughts into the pseudovoid. If expressing intrusive thoughts makes society worse, and should be controlled. That, arguably makes expressing thoughts a crime. You shouldn't be allowed to think or say thing. I guess you could insist that thinking is different from expressing, and that thinking is fine as long as you repress the inate human trait and desire of expression... But I feel that's a stupid line in the sand to draw given my intent was to point out 4chan doesn't make society worse, tolerating ideas you don't like generally improves society. It's how you behave that matters. In other words, If 4chan didn't exist, people would behave better. If you weren't exposed to those thoughts and ideas, you would behave better. If you didn't have a thought.... | ||||||||
|