▲ | eschaton a day ago | |||||||
I would suggest that you need to look at context in order to determine whether a phrase is being used as a dogwhistle. For example, if someone is also repeating other far-right propaganda (“fracking has solved the oil problem”), what are the chances that their use of this term is in good faith rather than as a dogwhistle? | ||||||||
▲ | Terr_ a day ago | parent [-] | |||||||
Hence "by default." Incidentally, are you claiming one of the above posters here has already included "other far-right propaganda" that tips the scales? From my perspective, there's been some kind of false-alarm. The danger exists out there, but--unless there's some author reputation I'm unaware of--this isn't it. | ||||||||
|