▲ | ibejoeb a day ago | |
There are some practical applications that are not necessarily related to security. If you are storing something like a medical record, you don't want use it as a public ID for a patient visit, because the date is subject to HIPAA. | ||
▲ | ownagefool 21 hours ago | parent | next [-] | |
This is probably not really true. You wouldn't be publishing patient visits publically, the only folks that'd legitimatly see that record would be those which access to that visit, and they'd most likely need to know the time of said visit. This access should be controlled via AuthN, AuthZ and audited. You'd also generally do a lot of time-based lookups on this data; what visits do I have today, this week, and so on. You might also want an additional DateTime field for timezones and offsets, but the v7 is probably better than v4 for this usecase. | ||
▲ | mulmen a day ago | parent | prev [-] | |
But they would have to relate that ID to patient data like their identity right? The date alone cannot be a HIPAA issue. That means every date is a HIPAA violation because people go to the doctor every day. |