There has to be a better formula to design this game. It seems valuable enough to explore.

It will be hard to design a formula that can only be gamed by making quality contributions.

A quality discussion requires parties who disagree, exchange of ideas and facts and ideally some kind of eventual agreement.

The hardest part is to make it enjoyable to use.

▲

Razengan a day ago | parent [-]

Maybe transparent AI is the only way to fairly govern masses of people?

Let people regularly vote on which prompts should be added/removed, and have the AI justify all of its decisions, show which information it used etc.

▲

econ 6 hours ago | parent | next [-]

I was thinking of discussion platforms but for general government I had a great idea: we know how to write and publish new laws but we are terrible at unpublishing outdated garbage laws. AI would be great for finding all laws that it thinks are dubious, impractical or otherwise undesirable in today's context and zeitgeist. There can be various manual deletion processes for different categories of absurdity.

▲

econ 8 hours ago | parent | prev | next [-]

An automated internet trial with robot judges and lawyers nominating users for warning banners of shame.

▲

flancian 21 hours ago | parent | prev | next [-]

I believe this is likely true and will become evident in time to most, but not all, carbon based systems.

▲

integralid a day ago | parent | prev [-]

That's the most dystopian thing I've read today

	▲	Razengan a day ago \| parent [-]
		Dystopia is the status quo: A handful of people controlling access for millions.