Something to think about (hah!) is there are people without an internal monologue i.e. no voice inside their head they use when working out a problem. So they're thinking and learning and doing what humans do just fine with no little voice no language inside their head.

▲

WJW a day ago | parent [-]

It's so weird that people literally seem to have a voice in their head they cannot control. For me personally my "train of thought" is a series of concepts, sometimes going as far as images. I can talk to myself in my head with language if I make a conscious effort to do so, just as I can breathe manually if I want. But if I don't, it's not really there like some people seem to have.

Probably there are at least two groups of people and neither really comprehends how the other thinks haha.

	▲	graemefawcett a day ago \| parent \| next [-]
		I think there are significantly more than 2, when you start to count variations through the spectrum of neurodiversity. Spatial thinkers, for example, or the hyperlexic. Meaning for hyperlexics is more akin to finding meaning in the edges of the graph, rather than the vertices. The form of language contributing a completely separate graph of knowledge, alongside its content, creating a rich, multimodal form of understanding. Spatial thinkers have difficulty with procedural thinking, which is how most people are taught. Rather than the series of steps to solve the problem, they see the shape of the transform. LLMs as an assistive device can be very useful for spatial thinkers in providing the translation layer between the modes of thought.
	▲	hyperliner a day ago \| parent \| prev [-]
		[dead]